It was a simple evening. I was drinking some hot tea and chatting with my mom on the phone, catching up on the latest gossip. She is often my source of new political information or she'll keep me updated on what generally happens to be trending in the media. In other words, she is my personal media watchdog. So, naturally, I was expecting her to have some juicy political gossip on this particular night when we were talking on the phone, but it always manages to surprise me when the gossip turns into threats on agriculture. Simply, because you wouldn't expect there to be so many threats on something so necessary in our society.
Our conversation started with her updating me on the untimely passing of the Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia. I thought our conversation would stay towards the political path because of this, but I must admit I was surprised when my mom mentioned that people actually found a way to blame his death on the fact that he had steak or red meat for dinner that night. I mean, how? Just how is it possible that one night's meal can have a life altering impact on you? If the people that made these ludicrous claims just did a little digging, they would find that Antonin Scalia has had a history of health issues.
Eating healthy is a lifestyle. It's a choice and one steak will have less impact than a lifetime of choosing to eat highly processed and greasy foods. Yet, somehow this information seems to get misconstrued through the media and consumers begin to believe that meat itself will cause unforgivable heart problems.
This website linked below is a prime example of taking information with a little bit of truth and blowing it out of proportion until it no longer holds any value.
http://vegnews.com/articles/page.do?pageId=5090&catId=7
The website contains numerous outrageous claims about the unhealthy side-affects of eating meat. One such statement is covered in a fallacy known as false equivalence, when there are two separate situations combined to compare and contrast the differences between them, when in reality there is no logical way they can be compared to one another. This particular fallacy is found in the opening statements of the website that states, "
Consuming the bodies of dead animals (and their loathsome by-products) is a real threat to human health. Americans are significantly more likely to die of heart disease or other diet-related (and preventable) causes than we are of zombie attacks, werewolves, or banshees. Give yourself a good fright with the following five harrowing ways that eating animal products can kill you."
If you visit this website, do me a favor and dig into the facts of their claims. Naturally, If you don't balance your red meat intake with other healthy foods such as vegetables and fruits, then your body will be lacking the nutrients only obtained through eating those foods. Just like your body would be lacking the essential amino acids obtained through the consumption of beef if you didn't eat meat. Actually, according to Rosie Sykes, a head chef for Fitzbillies, beef can reduce your risk of cancer and obesity if consumed in the right fashion and moderation. In fact, she states, "Beef from grass-fed cattle is a great source of omega 3 fatty acids, and conjugated linoleic acid, which some studies show reduces the risk of cancer, obesity, diabetes and some immune system disorders."
http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2013/dec/16/why-beef-is-good-for-you-grass-fed-grain-fed
Therefore, I beg of you readers to take the time to research the information that you find in the media, because more often than not you are being misguided.